Resumo: conteúdo trata sobre a classificação recente da Agência Internacional de Pesquisa sobre Câncer (IARC) do glifosato como um provável carcinógeno humano. Fato gerou considerável discussão, pois a classificação está em desacordo com as avaliações do potencial carcinogênico do glifosato por vários órgãos reguladores nacionais e internacionais.
Eur J Cancer Prev. 2016 Aug 22
The recent classification by International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) of the herbicide glyphosate as a probable human carcinogen has generated considerable discussion. The classification is at variance with evaluations of the carcinogenic potential of glyphosate by several national and international regulatory bodies.
The basis for the IARC classification is examined under the assumptions that the IARC criteria are reasonable and that the body of scientific studies determined by IARC staff to be relevant to the evaluation of glyphosate by the Monograph Working Group is sufficiently complete. It is shown that the classification of glyphosate as a probable human carcinogen was the result of a flawed and incomplete summary of the experimental evidence evaluated by the Working Group.
Rational and effective cancer prevention activities depend on scientifically sound and unbiased assessments of the carcinogenic potential of suspected agents. Implications of the erroneous classification of glyphosate with respect to the IARC Monograph Working Group deliberative process are discussed.
Veja mais em: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27552246